En nog! Igor en Grishka hebben gisteren zelf op usenet geposted!
It might happen in our papers (as it happens in every paper) that certain technical details (ie formulations, expressions, etc.) could be discussed or improved. We are open to any kind of suggestions. But we fermely challenge anybody to demonstrate that our ideas do nos make sense. What is important in theoretical physics? (as in any conceptual activity)? Essentially to propose and produce new ideas. And to make them appear as an element coherent with the existing corpus. From this point of view, we do assume that our work meet those standards.
En zelfs Alan Sokal schrijft een reactie. Internet is wijs. En dat allemaal tijdens het weekend.